
After a year step and sleep tracking with the Garmin Vivofit 2, I upgraded to an Apple Watch (Series 2) around four months ago. The Garmin model I had met my basic requirements, but when Apple announced Series 2 of its watch, I was intrigued by the added GPS functionality, breathing app and having access to some apps on my wrist when away from my desk. It was to be a sizable upgrade that had to be worth it, so if you're in the same boat I was in, this review may help you decide.
any form of activity tracking, no matter how simple, is better than nothing
First off, the Apple Watch has a different concept to activity tracking than the Vivofit. Where the focus of the Garmin was on step counting, the Apple Watch has three measures that are at the center of activity tracking: active calories, exercise minutes and stand hours. It also records steps, but they're unfortunately displayed less prominently.
Active calories (red bar) are recorded for moving, walking or exercising and are calculated based on your personal data such as age, height and weight, as well as heart rate, which the watch also measures. Exercise minutes (green bar) are recorded for more strenuous activity and also based on heart rate. Depending on fitness level, this may mean that for one person carrying groceries may be counted as exercise while for another it takes jogging or weights. A stand hour (blue bar) is counted when you move (min. stroll pace) for at least a minute each hour. If you haven't done so ten minutes to the full hour yet, you receive a reminder to “stand” within the next ten minutes.
In contrast, the Garmin has what it calls a move bar which fills up and reminds you to move around after one and two hours of inactivity, too. After that, it gives up while on the Apple Watch you continue receiving reminders every hour. This makes the Apple Watch more motivational, as it displays the streak of achievement per hour in the Activities app on the watch, while on the Garmin the data needs to be synced to the web app via phone or the included USB. Thinking about it now, the Vivofit did little more than track time, steps and a few other measures, and notably lacked the day overview and a graphical representation of the data that helps catch-up and manage activity for the rest of the day.
By far, the Apple Watch is substantially more motivating, which given the price difference, may not come as a surprise. The Vivofit 2 was a tenth of the price, but the features probably add up to a hundredth if you consider the possibilities of installed apps. Off the shelf though, the pros of using an Apple Watch over a device such as the Vivofit, for me, are:
Nothing is ever perfect and there are a few downsides to the Apple Watch. The main disadvantage is battery life, which is around 2-3 days for me. Most of the time it's in flight mode, as I don't use it as a smartwatch normally and I turn it off at night. That's not too bad, but compare it to Vivofit's estimated battery life of one year, which I can attest to.
The second disadvantage of the Apple Watch also relates to the battery. The Vivofit measures sleep and records periods of light and deep sleep. Although there are apps available for the Watch that can track sleep, using them would shorten its battery life to two days or less.
Finally, while the Apple Watch may boast all the bells and whistles, it comes at five to ten times the price of a Vivofit here in Australia and it requires ownership of an iPhone, which may not be a given.
The Garmin Vivofit 2 fulfilled its purpose for the year I had it and I believe that any form of activity tracking, no matter how simple, is better than nothing. Needless to say, I'm enjoying the Apple Watch much more and for me, it does a better job at making me get up and move frequently due to its visual representation of my progress or lack thereof.
-Alex
Category:
For updates on new tools and apps, subscribe to our newsletter. We only send these out when there's something truly exciting - we won't spam you.